Gas sensor market forecast to reach US$9.5 billion in 2034 with CAGR 6.6%

Marché des capteurs de gaz environnementaux 2024-2034 : technologie, tendances, prévisions, acteurs

Marché des capteurs de gaz environnementaux, CVC intelligent, surveillance de la pollution, qualité de l'air, odeur numérique, diagnostic de l'haleine, surveillance des batteries, maison intelligente, bâtiment intelligent, ville intelligente, marché des capteurs environnementaux, capteurs de particules, capteurs électrochimiques


Show All Description Contents, Table & Figures List Pricing Related Content
This dedicated environmental gas sensor report evaluates the performance of ten sensor technologies in detail - comparing their key characteristics and compatibility to five application areas. Key sensor technologies include metal oxide semiconductors, electrochemical sensors and infra-red sensors and optical particle counters, as well as photo-acoustic, printed and e-nose. These sensors have applications in growing markets for air quality monitoring for polluted cities to smart-offices. They play a key role in monitoring air quality as well as providing the necessary data for building automation services such as smart HVAC. This report includes over 30 company profiles from interviews with both major manufacturers and start-ups specializing in a range of different technologies. The report leverages IDTechEx's 15 years of experience in covering sensor technology, including interviews with major players, conference attendance, and bespoke projects and workshops on this topic.
 
IDTechEx have developed 10-year market forecasts for each technology and application sector, presented by both revenue and volume. We forecast a growing market for environmental applications worldwide, with an increasing proportion of revenue generated from infra-red sensors and optical particle counters. It is anticipated that a consumer market for digital smell will become more established, with existing technology combined with AI utilized in white goods and quality control. The most disruptive technologies are predicted to be printed and acoustic gas sensors, which hold the most promise for ultra-low form factor applications such as smart packaging and wearables.
 
Gas detection methods span a diverse technology landscape, ranging from established approaches such as metal oxide detectors to innovative emerging approaches such as acoustic gas sensing. Determining which technologies are best suited to the broad application space, including the rapidly growing market for IoT applications, requires analysis of attributes such as sensitivity, selectivity, cost, and compactness. This report comprehensively explores the technology-market fit for each technology and application, providing insight into the gas sensing requirements for the home, factory, and city of the future.
 
Industry Roadmap
 
Mass-digitization to drive widespread air quality monitoring
Vast sensor networks spanning our cities and integrated into our homes will offer greater automation and predictive maintenance, through continuous monitoring of parameters including air quality. Once a concern reserved for industrial facility managers, sophisticated air quality monitoring with gas sensors will both inform policy and enable consumers to make more informed choices regarding issues such as pollution, air-born pandemics and even climate change.
 
Widely distributed gas sensor networks will enable automated ventilation of schools, homes, monitor urban air quality, change government policies, control traffic, and more. The era of gas sensor data as technical information only accessible to scientists is ending, being overtaken by sensors which are easy to use, low power and affordable.
 
Mass-digitization of gas measurements will rely on software which goes beyond visualization, adding value through improved sensitivity, companion apps and closed loop control. We assess the hardware and business models enabling continuous measurement and identify commercial opportunities within environmental monitoring and air quality.
 
Hype versus realistic opportunity for digitized smell
There is no denying that aroma is important to us. The quality of food and drink is often first assessed just after we smell it. This ranges from whether we think yesterday's milk is safe, to expert opinions on the merits of a wine vintage. Historically the human nose has been our only means of identifying aromas - until now.
 
New sensor technology claims to act as a digital replacement to the nose and brain, capable of objectively quantifying smells. Moreover, the size and power of these so called 'e-noses' is small enough to allow them to be integrated into everything from cars and fridges to smart home products and phones. But how does digital smell work, and does the technology readiness level match the hype?
 
We not only explain the principle of 'e-nose' technology but compare the performance of newly commercialized devices - extracting realistic opportunities from marketing hype.
 
Technological roadmap towards miniaturization
Sensors small enough to fit inside a smart phone sell in high volumes, and micron scale gas sensor technology is emerging from the lab. Demand from the public for air quality sensors spiked during the pandemic, a trend set to continue beyond 2022.
 
Newly commercialized technology uses carbon nanotube inks printed on thin films. These advanced materials are a thousand times more sensitive than competitor technology. Optical particle counters are also shrinking, perhaps finally small enough to fit within wearables.
 
We benchmark the performance and application of this and other early-stage technology against established techniques. Alongside an in-depth review of printed sensors, we provide a roadmap towards ultra-miniaturized gas sensors.
  • Overview of major manufacturers
  • Detailed comparisons of price, sensitivity, cost, power consumption, size selectivity, and commercial readiness of both established and emerging technologies.
  • Benchmarking of technology and application including quantitative compatibility scores
  • SWOT analyses of ten distinct gas sensor technologies
  • Roadmaps by sector
 
  • Overview of emerging markets and drivers:
-Outdoor pollution (smart cities/climate change/health/regulation)
  • Indoor air quality (smart buildings and smart home)
  • Medical diagnostics (point-of-care breath diagnostics)
  • Automotive (battery monitoring in electric vehicles)
 
  • Smart Packaging (food waste/counterfeiting)
  • Progression in e-nose commercialization
  • Summary of new manufacturing processes using printing and carbon-nanotubes
  • Primary information from key companies.
Report MetricsDetails
CAGRGas sensor market forecast to reach US$9.5 billion in 2034 with CAGR 6.6%
Forecast Period2024 - 2034
Forecast UnitsVolume (Units), Annual Revenue (USD)
Segments CoveredForecasts are segmented by technology (10 categories) and application (Industrial, environmental, automotive, medical, olfaction). The ten technology categories are: 1) Metal Oxide 2) Electrochemical 3) Infra-Red 4) Pellistor 5) Photo Ionization Detectors 6) Optical Particle Counter 7) Printed Sensors 8) Acoustic 9) 3D-Printed 10) Other
Analyst access from IDTechEx
All report purchases include up to 30 minutes telephone time with an expert analyst who will help you link key findings in the report to the business issues you're addressing. This needs to be used within three months of purchasing the report.
Further information
If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to contact our report team at research@IDTechEx.com or call one of our sales managers:

AMERICAS (USA): +1 617 577 7890
ASIA (Japan): +81 3 3216 7209
EUROPE (UK) +44 1223 812300
Table of Contents
1.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1.Environmental gas sensor market: Analyst viewpoint
1.2.The environmental gas sensor market 'at a glance'
1.3.Environmental gas sensor market: Report scope
1.4.Gas sensors are established, why are there new market opportunities?
1.5.Historically safety and industrial sensor manufacturers are seeking growth in the environmental market
1.6.What are the market and technology drivers for change?
1.7.Interest in AI should boost demand for sensor networks - but lack of existing infrastructure creates a barrier to value creation
1.8.Gas Sensors future roadmap (1)
1.9.Gas sensor future roadmap (2)
1.10.Outdoor pollution monitoring creates an opportunity for gas sensors in 'smart-cities'
1.11.Gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring: Market map and value chain
1.12.Outdoor pollution sensing struggles to be integrated into successful business models
1.13.Outdoor Pollution Monitoring Market: Key Conclusions and Roadmap
1.14.The smart-buildings market creates an opportunity for indoor air quality sensors
1.15.Indoor air quality in smart-buildings: Market overview and gas sensor opportunities
1.16.Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Market in Smart Buildings: Key Conclusions and Roadmap
1.17.The smart-home market creates an opportunity for indoor air-quality monitoring
1.18.Smart-home indoor air quality monitoring: Market map and outlook
1.19.Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Market in Smart Home: Key Conclusions and Roadmap
1.20.Overview of breath diagnostic opportunities for miniaturized gas sensors
1.21.Evolution of point-of-care testing could create long term opportunities for new gas sensor technology
1.22.Miniaturized gas sensors for breath diagnostics: Conclusions and outlook
1.23.Overview of automotive market opportunities for miniaturized gas sensors
1.24.Comparing approaches to commercializing gas sensors for EV battery monitoring
1.25.Automotive market conclusions and outlook: Electric vehicles will fundamentally change gas sensor requirements of the automotive market
1.26.10-year overall gas sensors revenue forecast by sensor type (USD)
2.MARKET FORECASTS
2.1.Market forecast methodology
2.2.Challenges in forecasting a fragmented market
2.3.Categorizing applications areas for forecasting
2.4.Categorizing technology areas for forecasting
2.5.10-year overall gas sensors forecast by sensor type (volume)
2.6.10-year overall gas sensors revenue forecast by sensor type (USD)
2.7.10-year overall gas sensors forecast by sector (volume)
2.8.10-year overall gas sensors forecast by sector, excluding industrial and automotive (volume)
2.9.10-year overall gas sensors forecast by sector, excluding industrial and automotive (revenue, USD)
2.10.10-year emerging gas sensors forecast by sensor type (volume)
2.11.10-year emerging gas sensors revenue forecast by sensor type (USD)
2.12.Metal-oxide semiconductor gas sensor forecast by application (volume)
2.13.Metal-oxide semiconductor gas sensor revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.14.Electrochemical gas sensor forecast by application (volume)
2.15.Electrochemical gas sensor revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.16.Infra-red gas sensor forecast by application (volume)
2.17.Infra-red gas sensor forecast for the automotive market (volume)
2.18.Infrared gas sensor revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.19.Optical particle counter forecast by application (volume)
2.20.Optical particle counter revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.21.Pellistor sensors forecast by application (volume)
2.22.Pellistors revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.23.Ionization detectors forecast by application (volume)
2.24.Ionization detectors revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.25.Printed gas sensors forecast by application (volume)
2.26.Printed gas sensors revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.27.Acoustic gas sensors forecast by application (volume)
2.28.Acoustic gas sensors revenue forecast by application (USD)
2.29.3D printed and other printed gas sensors forecast by application (volume)
2.30.Environmental Sensors - Total sales volume by technology type
2.31.Environmental Gas Sensors - Total Revenue in $USD by technology type
2.32.Industrial Sensors - Total sales volume by technology type
2.33.Industrial Gas Sensors - Total Revenue in $USD by technology type
2.34.Automotive Sensors - Total sales volume by technology type
2.35.Automotive Gas Sensors - Total Revenue in $USD by technology type
2.36.Medical Sensors - Total sales volume by technology type
2.37.Medical Gas Sensors - Total Revenue in $USD by technology type
2.38.Olfaction Sensors - Total sales volume by technology type
2.39.Olfaction Gas Sensors - Total Revenue in $USD by technology type
3.INTRODUCTION
3.1.Report scope
3.2.Environmental gas sensors can add value in a wide range of industries
3.3.A brief history of gas sensor technology
3.4.Why can gas sensor technology still be considered 'emerging'?
3.5.What are the market and technology drivers for change?
3.6.Key metrics for assessing a gas sensor
3.7.Health risks motivates gas sensing across all sectors
3.8.Introduction to outdoor pollution
3.9.Introduction to indoor air quality
3.10.What is particulate matter and why is it dangerous?
3.11.Particulate matter concerns are on the rise again
3.12.What are VOCs?
3.13.Will there be a need for more specific VOC sensors?
3.14.Sulphur dioxide emissions have reduced in the West but until recently remains poorly regulated in India
3.15.Nitrogen Oxides agriculture and burning depletes ozone and causes the most deaths in coal burning countries
3.16.Too much ozone can reduce crop yields
3.17.Introduction to automotive gas sensors
3.18.Introduction to gas sensors for breath diagnostics
3.19.Introduction to E-nose technology
4.GAS SENSORS -TECHNOLOGY APPRAISAL AND KEY PLAYERS
4.1.1.There is continual innovation for existing technologies, and new opportunities emerging from the lab
4.2.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Metal Oxide Sensors
4.2.1.Introduction to Metal Oxide (MOx) gas sensors
4.2.2.Typical specifications of MOx sensors
4.2.3.Traditional versus MEMS MOx gas sensors
4.2.4.Advantages of MEMS MOx sensors
4.2.5.Identifying key MOx sensors manufacturers
4.2.6.N-Type vs P-Type semiconductors in MOx sensors
4.2.7.MOx offers multiple parameter sensing
4.2.8.Competition on warm-up time, size and cost
4.2.9.Printed MOx sensors
4.2.10.Screen Printed MOx sensors
4.2.11.SWOT analysis of MOx gas sensors
4.2.12.Three key conclusions: Metal oxide gas sensors
4.3.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Electrochemical Sensors
4.3.1.Introduction to electrochemical gas sensors
4.3.2.Typical specifications of electrochemical sensors
4.3.3.Innovations in electrochemical sensing
4.3.4.Printed Electrochemical Sensors
4.3.5.Traditional versus printed electrochemical sensors
4.3.6.Outdoor environmental sensing demand is driving competition between electrochemical sensor manufacturers
4.3.7.Electrochemical Lambda Sensor
4.3.8.Major manufacturers of electrochemical sensors
4.3.9.SWOT analysis of electrochemical gas sensors
4.3.10.Summary: Electrochemical sensors
4.4.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Infra-red Sensors
4.4.1.Introduction to infrared gas sensors
4.4.2.Non-dispersive infrared most common for gas sensing
4.4.3.Infra-red sensors can be used for explosive limit measurements
4.4.4.Identifying key infra-red gas sensor manufacturers
4.4.5.Typical specifications of NDIR gas sensors
4.4.6.SWOT analysis of infra-red gas sensors
4.4.7.Summary: Infra-red sensors
4.5.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Pellistors
4.5.1.Introduction to pellistor sensors
4.5.2.Industrial safety depends on pellistor sensors
4.5.3.Identifying key pellistor sensor manufacturers
4.5.4.Pellistor sensor poisoning - causes and mitigating strategies
4.5.5.Miniaturisation of pellistor gas sensors
4.5.6.Explosive Limit Detectors: Pellistor vs Infra-red
4.5.7.Typical specifications of pellistor sensors
4.5.8.SWOT analysis of pellistor gas sensors
4.5.9.Summary: Pellistors
4.6.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Ionization Detectors
4.6.1.Introduction to photoionization detectors (PID)
4.6.2.Ionization chambers for naturally radioactive sources
4.6.3.Response regions in ionization chambers have different applications
4.6.4.Categorization of ionization detector manufacturers
4.6.5.Typical specifications of ionization detectors
4.6.6.SWOT analysis of Photo Ionization Detectors
4.6.7.Summary: Ionization detectors
4.7.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Optical Particle Counters
4.7.1.Optical Particle Counter
4.7.2.Typical specifications of optical particle counters
4.7.3.Bosch reveal their latest particulate matter sensor small enough for wearable integration
4.7.4.Identifying key optical particle counter manufacturers
4.7.5.SWOT analysis of Optical Particle Counters
4.7.6.Summary: Optical particle counters
4.8.Core Gas Sensor Technologies: Overview
4.8.1.Relevant analytes to industrial and environmental markets are almost identical
4.8.2.Comparing key specifications of core technologies
4.8.3.Industrial technology is finding a new market in environmental gas sensor markets
4.8.4.Summary of temperature and humidity effects on core gas sensor technology
4.8.5.Comparing key industrial players sensor innovations against ability to execute
4.8.6.Notable company relationships
4.8.7.The gas sensor value chain
4.8.8.Gas Sensor Manufacturers
4.8.9.Summary of core technology conclusions
4.8.10.Established markets for core gas sensing technologies: industrial facilities
4.8.11.Overview of key core gas sensors and analytes in portable gas safety in industry
4.8.12.Increased expectations in the gas safety market is a driver for adoption of new technology
4.8.13.Industrial players are seeking growth in the overlapping environmental market
4.8.14.Barriers to entering the industrial gas sensors market
4.9.Emerging Gas Sensor Technologies
4.10.Emerging Gas Sensor Technologies: Printed sensors
4.10.1.What defines a 'printed' sensor?
4.10.2.A brief overview of screen, slot-die, gravure and flexographic printing
4.10.3.A brief overview of digital printing methods
4.10.4.Towards roll to roll (R2R) printing
4.10.5.Advantages of roll-to-roll (R2R) manufacturing
4.10.6.Printed sensor categories
4.10.7.Miniaturization of core technologies improves performance
4.10.8.Zeolites can form a selective membrane for gas sensors
4.10.9.Aerosol-jet-printed graphene electrochemical histamine sensors for food safety monitoring
4.10.10.C2Sense ink based gas sensing for packaging
4.10.11.Meeting application requirements: Incumbent technologies vs printed/flexible sensors
4.10.12.Printed Gas Sensors - Summary and key players
4.10.13.Overall SWOT analysis of printed sensors
4.11.Emerging Gas Sensor Technologies: E-nose
4.11.1.A brief history of measuring smell
4.11.2.Principle of Sensing: E-Nose
4.11.3.Expensive lab-bench e-noses were commercialized first
4.11.4.Advantages and disadvantaged of sensor types for E-Nose
4.11.5.E-Nose sensors hype curve
4.11.6.Technological and market readiness of e-noses
4.11.7.Sensigent: Cyranose Electronic Nose
4.11.8.Categorization of e-nose manufacturers
4.11.9.Bosch Sensortec are using MOx sensors in their latest 'e-nose' for smells, air quality and food spoilage
4.11.10.A closer look at Bosch's BME 688
4.11.11.Aryballe are developing a portable and universal e-nose for anosmia suffers
4.11.12.Aryballe automotive use cases for e-noses
4.11.13.UST triplesensor-the artificial nose
4.11.14.PragmatIC and Arm develop prototype e-nose with flexible electronics
4.11.15.Arm's armpit odor monitor idea still at an early TRL
4.11.16.Summary: Specific aromas a better opportunity than a nose
4.11.17.SWOT analysis of E-noses
4.12.Emerging Gas Sensor Technologies: Carbon Nanotubes
4.12.1.An introduction to CNTs for gas sensors
4.12.2.AerNos produce CNT based gas sensors for multiple application areas, including wearables
4.12.3.CNT-based electronic nose (PARC)
4.12.4.SmartNanotubes Technologies, miniaturized e-nose with single-walled CNTs
4.12.5.Alpha Szenszor Inc., ultra-low power gas sensors with CNTs
4.12.6.MIT research: Carbon nanotubes plus catalysts can sense vegetable spoilage
4.12.7.Brewer science, printed sensor for inert gases
4.12.8.Graphene based gas sensing first demonstrated by Fujitsu in 2016
4.12.9.SWOT analysis of CNT gas sensors
4.13.Emerging Gas Sensor Technologies: Miniaturized Photoacoustic
4.13.1.Principle of Sensing: Photoacoustic
4.13.2.Indirect and Direct Photo-acoustic sensing
4.13.3.Sensirion and Infineon offer a miniaturized photo-acoustic carbon dioxide sensor
4.13.4.Typical specifications of commercial photo-acoustic sensors
4.13.5.SWOT analysis of photo acoustic gas sensors
4.14.Emerging Gas Sensor Technologies: Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (FBAR)
4.14.1.Principle of sensing: Film bulk acoustic resonator
4.14.2.Sorex - an FBAR start-up spun out of the University of Cambridge
4.14.3.Expected specifications of commercial acoustic resonance sensors
4.14.4.SWOT analysis of FBAR gas sensors
4.15.Research Phase Gas Sensor Technologies
4.15.1.3D-printed colour changing hydrogels for gas sensing with direct laser writing
4.15.2.3D-Printed silver fibres for breath analysis
4.15.3.3D-printing strong ammonia sensors using digital light processing
4.15.4.3D-Printed disposable wireless sensors large area environmental monitoring
4.15.5.SWOT analysis of 3D printed gas sensors
4.15.6.Miniaturized Chromatograph
4.15.7.Timeline of key developments in miniaturized gas chromatography
4.15.8.Bio-degradable printed chromatography
4.15.9.SWOT analysis of miniaturized gas chromatography
4.15.10.Quartz Crystal Microbalance
4.15.11.Hydrogels used for flexible and wearable ammonia sensors
4.16.Benchmarking technologies and applications
4.16.1.Intersection between sensing technology and application space
4.16.2.Application and technology benchmarking methodology
4.16.3.Attribute scores: Technology
4.16.4.Attribute scores: Application
4.16.5.Computing computability scores between technology and application
5.OUTDOOR POLLUTION SENSOR MARKET
5.1.1.Chapter overview: Outdoor pollution sensor market
5.2.Outdoor Pollution: Health Risks and Regulations
5.2.1.Key analytes for outdoor pollution monitoring
5.2.2.Outdoor pollution is a global risk to health
5.2.3.Cost to society of air pollution drives demand for air quality monitoring
5.2.4.Outdoor pollution continues to drive climate change
5.2.5.Gas pollution entering water systems damages the environment and costs governments billions
5.2.6.Fertilizing with ammonia in the countryside creates more pollutants in urban areas
5.2.7.Tighter regulations and recommendations for outdoor air quality are increasing the need for sensitive gas sensors
5.2.8.The EU approach to air quality regulation separates annual emissions from sector specific requirements
5.2.9.How will technology be used to monitor regulatory limits?
5.2.10.Typical policies for tackling poor outdoor air quality
5.3.Market Outlook: Smart Cities, Industrial Monitoring and Consumer Electronics
5.3.1.Outdoor pollution monitoring creates an opportunity for gas sensors in 'smart-cities'
5.3.2.Connecting air quality data to policy impact
5.3.3.Incumbent technology challenges - fixed monitoring stations are large and expensive
5.3.4.Key miniaturized gas sensor technologies for outdoor pollution monitoring
5.3.5.The role of miniaturized gas sensors in outdoor air quality monitoring 'nodes'
5.3.6.The high sensitivity and broad analyte range of electrochemical sensors has seen them adopted by multiple smart-city monitoring companies
5.3.7.Sensors offer a variety of monitoring techniques
5.3.8.Air quality monitoring for smart-cities have been a relatively low volume market for miniaturized gas sensor technology
5.3.9.Lack of regulatory pressure limits adoption of miniaturized gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring (1)
5.3.10.Lack of regulatory pressure limits adoption of miniaturized gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring (2)
5.3.11.Infrastructure improvements are essential for increased adoption of low-cost gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring in towns and cities (1)
5.3.12.Infrastructure improvements are essential for increased adoption of low-cost gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring in towns and cities (2)
5.3.13.Demand for early-wildfire detection systems are growing
5.3.14.Industrial markets create a clearer business case for low-cost gas sensor nodes compared to smart-cities
5.3.15.Malodor monitoring presents an opportunity for e-nose sensors in the agricultural market
5.3.16.Mobile platforms for outdoor pollution monitoring is emerging as a more efficient alternative to sensor networks for hyper-local data collection (1)
5.3.17.Mobile platforms for outdoor pollution monitoring is emerging as a more efficient alternative to sensor networks for hyper-local data collection (2)
5.3.18.Drones as mobile platforms value the low size and weight of miniaturised gas sensors for industry, agriculture and law-enforcement
5.3.19.An opportunity for rental bike and e-scooter mounted optical particle counters
5.3.20.State of the market for miniaturised gas sensors in wearables for outdoor pollution monitoring
5.3.21.The next generation of super miniaturised gas-sensors have the potential to penetrate the mainstream smart-phone and wearables markets
5.3.22.Many consumers prefer to access third-party out-door air quality data
5.3.23.Gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring: Market map and value chain
5.3.24.Miniaturized gas sensors for outdoor pollution monitoring: Conclusions and outlook
6.INDOOR AIR QUALITY SENSOR MARKET
6.1.1.Chapter overview: Indoor air quality sensor market
6.2.Indoor Air Quality: Overview of Health Risks
6.2.1.Key analytes for indoor air quality monitoring
6.2.2.Overview of health risks associated with indoor pollution
6.2.3.Wood-burning indoors is a major health risk
6.2.4.Indoor air pollution remains a significant health risk in high-income nations despite regulation
6.2.5.Lack of ventilation can compound the risk of radon in the northern hemisphere
6.2.6.Allergens trapped indoors are causing a surge in asthma cases in the United States
6.2.7.How is gas sensor technology currently being used to tackle indoor air quality?
6.3.Market Outlook: Smart Building
6.3.1.Overview of the 'smart-building' value proposition and sensor requirements
6.3.2.Segmenting the smart-building market
6.3.3.Benchmarking opportunities in the gas sensor market by technology type
6.3.4.Impact of indoor air quality regulation on the gas sensor opportunity in the smart-buildings market (1)
6.3.5.Impact of indoor air quality regulation on the gas sensor opportunity in the smart-buildings market (1)
6.3.6.Air quality focus in 'health building' standards is gradually driving growth for the smart-building market
6.3.7.Fire safety in smart-buildings - gas sensor dependent but with high barriers to adoption for new-tech
6.3.8.Overview of building management systems for indoor air quality
6.3.9.Indoor air quality in smart-buildings: Market overview and gas sensor opportunities
6.3.10.How are specialist air quality management services differentiating?
6.3.11.Indoor air quality monitoring for smart-buildings a higher-volume market than outdoor pollution sensing
6.3.12.Miniaturized gas sensors for indoor monitoring in smart buildings: Conclusions and outlook
6.4.Market Outlook: Smart Home
6.4.1.Introduction to the Smart Home market for indoor air quality monitoring
6.4.2.Smart Home technology OEMs are still betting on it going 'mainstream'
6.4.3.How can OEMs access the mass market for indoor air quality monitors post-covid?
6.4.4.Comparing technology specs of smart-home air quality monitors
6.4.5.Smart purifiers are an increasingly popular solution for poor air quality
6.4.6.Market leaders include particulate matter sensors in product offerings
6.4.7.Air quality and the internet of things
6.4.8.Which business models for indoor air quality products are sustainable?
6.4.9.Opportunity for air quality monitoring within wellness and fitness monitoring remains
6.4.10.Relationship between air quality regulations and technology
6.4.11.Smart-home indoor air quality monitoring: market map and outlook
6.4.12.Comparing device costs of smart-home technology for IAQ monitoring
6.4.13.Challenges for indoor air quality devices in the smart-home
6.4.14.Miniaturized gas sensors for indoor monitoring in smart buildings: Conclusions and outlook
7.OTHER MARKETS: BREATH DIAGNOSTICS AND AUTOMOTIVE
7.1.Miniaturized Gas Sensors for Breath Diagnostics
7.1.1.Introduction to gas sensors for breath diagnostics
7.1.2.Key market sectors for miniaturized gas sensors and breath diagnostics
7.1.3.Why does breath-diagnostics need new gas sensor technology?
7.1.4.Growing market for biomedical diagnostics
7.1.5.Key sensor characteristics for point-of-care diagnostics
7.1.6.Evolution of point-of-care testing could create long term opportunities for new gas sensor technology
7.1.7.There are better alternatives to breath diagnostics for point-of-care diabetes management
7.1.8.Market map of miniaturized gas sensors for breath diagnostics
7.1.9.Miniaturized gas sensors for breath diagnostics: Conclusions and outlook
7.2.Miniaturized Gas Sensors for the Automotive Market
7.2.1.Introduction to automotive gas sensors
7.2.2.The rise of the EV could shift the role of gas sensors from emissions testing to battery management
7.2.3.Value proposition of gas sensors on battery monitoring: Early thermal runaway detection
7.2.4.Comparing approaches to commercializing gas sensors for battery monitoring
7.2.5.The market for indoor air quality sensors will likely expand within automotive
7.2.6.EU Mandating Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning in July 2022, yet IDTechEx predicts gas sensor requirements to be niche
7.2.7.Examples of alternative approaches to monitoring drivers: wearables
7.2.8.Examples of alternative approaches to monitoring drivers: Gas sensors for alcohol analysis on driver breath
7.2.9.Driver interlocks with breathalyzer's a nearer term opportunity for gas sensors compared to passive driver monitoring
7.2.10.Gas sensors compete with other emerging technologies, such as mm-wave for advanced driver monitoring
7.2.11.Artificial olfaction could allow manufacturers to quantify that 'new-car smell'
7.2.12.Labor shortages continue to drive adoption of sensors, AI and robotics within the Agricultural mobility market - but gas sensors adoption remains niche
7.2.13.Market saturation vs technology readiness level in the automotive gas sensor market
8.8. COMPANY PROFILES
8.1.Adsentec
8.2.AerNos
8.3.Aeroqual
8.4.AirThings
8.5.Alphasense
8.6.AQ Mesh
8.7.Aryballe
8.8.Bosch
8.9.Breezometer
8.10.C2Sense
8.11.Cubic
8.12.Drager
8.13.Ecosense
8.14.FIS
8.15.Gas Sensing Solutions
8.16.INFUSER
8.17.ioAirFlow
8.18.Johnson Controls
8.19.Kaiterra
8.20.Metis Engineering
8.21.NANOZ
8.22.Oizom
8.23.Oizom
8.24.Renesas
8.25.Scentroid
8.26.Sensair
8.27.Sensirion
8.28.SGX Sensortech
8.29.Siemens
8.30.Smart Nanotubes Technologies
8.31.Sorex Sensors
8.32.SPEC Sensors
8.33.Spexor
8.34.Voi
 

Ordering Information

Marché des capteurs de gaz environnementaux 2024-2034 : technologie, tendances, prévisions, acteurs

£$¥
Electronic (1-5 users)
£5,650.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
£8,050.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
£6,450.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
£8,850.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
€6,400.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
€9,100.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
€7,310.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
€10,010.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
$7,000.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
$10,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
$7,975.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
$10,975.00
Electronic (1-5 users)
¥990,000
Electronic (6-10 users)
¥1,406,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
¥1,140,000
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
¥1,556,000
Electronic (1-5 users)
元50,000.00
Electronic (6-10 users)
元72,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (1-5 users)
元58,000.00
Electronic and 1 Hardcopy (6-10 users)
元80,000.00
Click here to enquire about additional licenses.
If you are a reseller/distributor please contact us before ordering.
お問合せ、見積および請求書が必要な方はm.murakoshi@idtechex.com までご連絡ください。

Report Statistics

Slides 342
Forecasts to 2034
ISBN 9781915514936
 

Preview Content

pdf Document Webinar Slides
pdf Document Sample pages
 
 
 
 

Subscription Enquiry